Consortium e-Learning Network has published peer-reviewed journals from Noida since 2005. Across our imprints — STM Journals, MBA Journals, Law Journals and our partner publisher JournalsPub — the catalogue runs to more than 270 titles, and most of them are open for submissions right now.
Where the work is going
Submissions are not evenly spread, and it is worth knowing where a paper will find the most active readership. On our main platform the largest collections are Computer and IT (25 journals, over 4,200 articles), Medical Sciences (22 journals), Mechanical Engineering (13 journals), Life Sciences (10 journals) and Multidisciplinary (9 journals), with substantial collections in Chemical, Civil, Electrical and Electronics engineering, Pharmacy, Applied Sciences and Energy.
If your work sits across two of those, say so in the cover note. Picking the wrong journal is the single most common reason a sound paper takes an extra month: it has to be reassigned before anyone can review it.
What reaches review quickly
- A clear claim in the abstract. One sentence that says what is new. Reviewers decide how carefully to read from this.
- Methods someone else could repeat. Instruments, versions, sample sizes, and the conditions you actually ran — not the ones you intended to.
- Figures that carry their own captions. If a figure needs the body text to make sense, it will be queried.
- A reference list that matches the citations. Entries cited but missing, and entries listed but never cited, are the most frequent mechanical corrections we send back.
- Declared conflicts, funding and data availability. Missing declarations hold up acceptance even when the science is fine.
What slows a paper down
In practice: a scope mismatch with the journal, an unclear corresponding author, figures supplied only inside the manuscript file at screen resolution, and reference styles mixed between two conventions. None of these are reasons to reject good work, but each one adds a round trip.
How review runs
Papers are checked for scope and completeness, screened for similarity, then sent to subject reviewers. Decisions come back with the reviewers' comments attached, and a revision is answered point by point rather than in a summary. Accepted articles are copyedited, typeset, and published with a registered DOI so they can be cited and found.
Our full guidance for authors — formatting, ethics, authorship and charges — is on the journals site, and the submission system will tell you what is missing before it lets you finish.
Before you submit
Read the aims and scope of the specific journal, not just the subject area. Check the author guidelines for reference style. Have your figures as separate files. And if you are unsure which of our titles fits, the submission system will suggest journals once it has read your abstract.